Before UAT Pocket
- Evidence separated from the issue.
- Defects rewritten after the test session.
- Multiple spreadsheet versions shared by email.
- Unclear ownership and missing fix context.
- Retest results disconnected from the original report.
Take a photo, describe what went wrong, review a clear issue draft, and keep every fix and retest connected until the defect is verified and closed.
Android: Available now on Google PlayiPhone: Coming soon
Photo-first · Voice-assisted · Human-reviewed AI
Built for UAT teams

More context. Clear ownership. Verified closure.
Screenshots on a phone, notes in another app, trackers in spreadsheets, and updates buried in email create incomplete reports and slow clarification cycles. UAT Pocket keeps the evidence, issue details, ownership, vendor response, and retest history together.
Notice unexpected behavior during UAT.
Add a photo or screenshot, voice observation, and quick note.
Create the issue manually or generate an AI-assisted draft.
Edit the fields and confirm the evidence before submission.
Assign the issue and preserve its lifecycle history.
Let the vendor investigate, clarify, and provide fix/build details.
Review the original issue and add retest evidence.
Pass and close, or reopen for further investigation.
Every draft is reviewed by a person. Every closure follows a retest.


Take a photo or attach a screenshot while you test. Add a quick note, record a spoken observation, and review the transcript before it becomes part of the issue.

Use optional AI assistance to turn evidence and context into an editable UAT draft. Review the title, description, expected and actual results, severity, category, and follow-up questions before you submit.
Choose Submit Issue when you’re ready. Manual creation remains available if AI is disabled or unavailable.

See project status, issue counts, ownership, environment, members, and recent activity without assembling another tracker.
A shared view of what needs attention, who owns the next action, and what’s ready to verify.


Vendors can investigate, request clarification, record fix details, and mark an issue ready for retest. Testers can review the original evidence, add retest evidence, then pass and close or reopen the issue.
Capture evidence and submit clearer defects with less typing.
Review quality, clarification, ownership, and lifecycle history.
Track blockers, assignments, project health, and retest readiness.
Investigate, comment, provide fix/build details, and hand work back for retest.
A concise look at the problem, the workflow, and the outcome we’re building for.
View Product One-PagerCapture → Fix → Retest → Verified closure
Our architectural principles keep project context and human decisions at the center.
Download the Android app today. The iPhone version is coming soon; leave your details to receive an iOS launch update.
Download for AndroidNo. UAT Pocket is a mobile system of engagement for UAT capture and completion. A downstream system may remain the formal system of record.
No. AI can prepare an editable draft, but the user must review it and explicitly submit the issue. Manual creation remains available.
Yes. Vendor users can review evidence, comment, investigate, request clarification, provide fix/build information, and mark work ready for retest according to their project role.
Yes. During retest, the tester can pass and close the issue or reopen it with new evidence and return ownership for further investigation.
The MVP supports modest offline behavior such as cached data and local unsent capture drafts. AI generation, submission, and critical status transitions may require connectivity.
Access is based on authenticated project membership and role-aware server rules. Evidence is stored privately and sensitive issue content is excluded from analytics parameters.